Anchor Books The O. Henry Prize Stories
About the Series Widely regarded as the nation's most prestigious awards for short fiction
O. Henry Bio
Publishing History
Author Spotlight
Prize Jury
About the Editor
Notable Magazines
Index of Literary Magazines
Contact Us
Contact Us

Prize Jury 2010
  • Junot Díaz
  • Paula Fox
  • Yiyun Li

  • Read about other jurors and their selected favorites.

    Junot Díaz

    Junot Díaz was born in 1968 in the Dominican Republic and raised in New Jersey. He is the author of Drown and The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao, which won the John Sargent, Sr., First Novel Prize; the National Book Critics Circle Award; the Anisfield-Wolf Book Award; and the 2008 Pulitzer Prize. Díaz has been awarded the Eugene McDermott Award, a fellowship from the Guggenheim Foundation, a Lila Acheson Wallace Reader's Digest Award, the 2002 PEN/Malamud Award, the 2003 U.S./Japan Creative Artist Fellowship from the National Endowment for the Arts, a fellowship at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study at Harvard University, and the Rome Prize from the American Academy of Arts and Letters. He is the fiction editor at the Boston Review and the Rudge (1948), and Nancy Allen Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Juror Favorite:
    Junot Díaz on "A Spoiled Man" by Daniyal Mueenuddin

    What a superb story. What a gift.

    I cannot stress enough what a marvel this story is. From the title onward the author displays a courteous offhand ferocity unlike any I've ever encountered. The writing is clear, kind, disarming. The rhythms are classic, Chekhovian. But what awaits is the reason I got into this art game in the first place.

    Enter Rezak, an old, lonely man on the edge of Islamabad, on the edge of summer-home privilege, on the edge of, basically, everything, trying to make himself "useful" as the string runs out on the last days of his life. The writer puts my man in a box, in a literal box, and so with understated self-conscious panache we get, "Opening the heavy padlock, he lifted the door hatch and climbed in. . . . Tiny red lights, run off an electrical connection drawn from the poultry sheds, were strung all over the ceiling and warmed the chamber. He could sit but not stand inside, and had covered the floor with a cotton mattress, which gave off a ripe animal odor, deeply comforting to him."

    Here is marginalized third-world living in a single devastating half sentence: "He could sit but not stand."

    And not far from where Rezak's box squats stands the Harounis' weekend digs. Home to Harouni—American-educated Pakistani who has come into money and is probably making some of his own now—and his game American wife.

    From this primal situation you could spin a million tales, but Daniyal Mueenuddin spins what I would argue is the best one. So casually terrifying and so irrefutably true I finished "A Spoiled Man" with my heart blown out.

    I've always thought that it is the curse-lure of short stories that they can be perfect and the curse-lure of novels that they cannot. Here in my mind is a story that nears perfection. In a matter of pages, Daniyal Mueenuddin not only charts the downfall of one humble man's heart; he also draws back the gnostic veil that often obscures the truth about our world: that it is in fact multiple worlds existing in one another's midst. Daniyal Mueenuddin does so with such economy and so patent a lack of fanfare you wouldn't be blamed for thinking it an accident.

    For in part this is what this sublime story is kinda-sorta about: worlds. The fact that we, all of us, live in a terrible concatenation of often mutually exclusive but nevertheless articulated worlds. Often ignorant of one another, governed by a cruel economy that dictates who gets seen, who remains unseen, who can remain ignorant of the other worlds, who cannot and who can be devoured by the world above, despite all intentions, with nary a good-bye. Strategically, Daniyal Mueenuddin allows us to inhabit all the various characters in the drama, from upright Rezak to Sonya, the American wife, and reminds us, with one shocking reversal, that it is the very way this ecology of worlds is structured that makes the kind of fall that Rezak suffers not only probable, but inevitable.

    I'm putting this all in head terms, not doing a good job describing this story's power, its nuance, its sudden dark turn. How could I?

    Cetaceans, I read recently, have muscles that allow them to shape the lenses of their eyes so they can see equally well above water as below. They can, in other words, see in two worlds. We humans are not so biologically fortunate. It is only art that can shape our eyes to see all our various worlds, only art that reminds us at times gently, at times forcefully, of what we are and what we've let ourselves become. Stories like "A Spoiled Man" are the subtle knife that cuts open the membranes that hold the worlds apart and allows us not only to see into our other worlds but for a moment to reside there as well. What more could we ask from art? From a short story? From a writer?

    Paula Fox

    Paula Fox was born in 1923 and has been writing since she was in her early twenties. Since her first novel, Poor George (1967), and first book for children, Maurice's Room (1966), she's published books for young people, as well as novels, such as Desperate Characters and The Widow's Children, and short stories for which she's twice been awarded an O. Henry Prize (2005 and 2006). Her memoirs are Borrowed Finery and The Coldest Winter: A Stringer in Liberated Europe. Fox lives in Brooklyn, New York.

    Juror Favorite:
    Paula Fox on "Oh, Death" by James Lasdun

    Short stories bring readers news of people, places, the often inexplicable vagaries of life, the search for meaning or the threat of meaninglessness, crises and events characters themselves find incomprehensible. My reading of the stories in The PEN/O. Henry Prize Stories 2010 took me to places I'd never been, Nigeria, Malaysia, Pakistan, a Greek prison island, a South American city, and areas of the United States of which I have scant knowledge.

    How does one determine the "best" stories? All are human efforts to grasp the truths of experience, of life. Even when stories fail, all of them convey the mystery that lies at the center of human existence. Chekhov and Flannery O'Connor were artists, one great, the other very good. When I read their stories, I am sometimes puzzled about which writer I would apply the word great to.

    Storytelling, as far as is known, began millennia ago—a tribe gathered around a fire in the night, a storyteller standing before it, telling a tale that would illuminate and teach.

    Of course, there is the entertainment of storytelling, the charm, the knowledge, the comedy. And perhaps as significant, a temporary vacation from the reader's own troubles. Reading these stories made me feel more hopeful about this world, reminding me that there's far more variation in life than I ever imagined!

    All the stories I read in The PEN/O. Henry Prize Stories 2010 said something of value about the way we live, often showed the frequent cruelty or indifference with which we treat others in the same boat—lifeboat!

    Some of the stories in the present collection had outstanding characters but barely a story, others were reports of events, interesting enough but rather like reading newspaper reports. I chose the following seven for their fulfilling aspects of good writing: "Oh, Death" by James Lasdun, "Into the Gorge" by Ron Rash, "Sheep May Safely Graze" by Jess Row, "The Bridge" by Daniel Alarcón, "Them Old Cowboy Songs" by Annie Proulx, "Visitation" by Brad Watson, and "Some Women" by Alice Munro. I also recommend "The Headstrong Historian" by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, "A Spoiled Man" by Daniyal Mueenuddin, and "Birch Memorial" by Preeta Samarasan.

    Of all these, my favorite was "Oh, Death" by James Lasdun.

    Told by a compassionate narrator, "Oh, Death" is the story of Rick, a man easily aroused to anger. The writing is supple and subtle. This reader had the sense of a voice speaking simply but eloquently of events filled with dramatic tensions, yet the reader did not have to make that partially conscious adjustment between print and inner comprehension. This is the one story, I found, that has the Chekhovian quality of being a human voice, not words on a page—not always a virtue in writing but essential to the quality of "Oh, Death."

    Yiyun Li

    Yiyun Li was born in Beijing in 1972, and came to the United States in 1996. Her stories and essays have been published in The New Yorker, Best American Short Stories, The O. Henry Prize Stories 2008, and elsewhere. She has received fellowships and awards from the Lannan Foundation and the Whiting Foundation. Her debut collection, A Thousand Years of Good Prayers, won the Frank O'Connor International Short Story Award, PEN/Hemingway Award, Guardian First Book Award, and California Book Award for first fiction; it was also short-listed for the Kiriyama Prize and the Orange Prize for New Writers. In 2007, she was selected by Granta as one of the 21 Best Young American Novelists under 35. Her latest book is a novel, The Vagrants. She teaches at University of California, Davis, and lives in Oakland, California.

    Juror Favorite:
    Yiyun Li on "The Woman of the House" by William Trevor

    A while ago I reread A Farewell to Arms, and reencountered a line that greatly impressed me when I first read the novel at nineteen: "The world breaks everyone and afterward many are strong at the broken places. But those that will not break it kills." Though what resonated more in the rereading, which had eluded me when I was younger, was a character's observation of small people who did not occupy the main stage in Hemingway's books. "That is why the peasant has wisdom," said the character, "because he is defeated from the start."

    I enjoyed reading the stories in The PEN/O. Henry Prize Stories 2010. Many of the characters' struggles against what has come to break them—nature, history, love, hope, kinship, loneliness—stayed with me. A few stories kept me awake at night, but, as a longtime admirer of William Trevor's work, I was pleased to discover that "The Woman of the House" was one of his.

    Like many of Trevor's stories, "The Woman of the House" explores the subdued and sometimes neglected dramas in the lives of those characters who have not much to start with nor much to end up with. The roaming brothers—called Gypsies though they were not—harbored the hope "that there might somewhere be a life that was more than they yet knew" yet "their immediate purpose" was about survival. The crippled man, unable to go outdoors for years, wanted two fresh coats of paint for his house, which he would not see with his eyes. Martina, the crippled man's cousin and lodging with him as a caretaker by arrangement, "had once known what she wanted, but she wasn't so sure about that anymore." Silence prevailed in the story: the brothers chose not to understand English when it was convenient, and between themselves they communicated more with their eyes than with language; Martina, listening to old-time music played on the wireless, was told that the music was terrible by the crippled man, yet she chose not to comment on that. "The ancient Dodge was part of Martina's circumstances, to be tolerated because it was necessary"—and indeed other things were tolerated by her, too, out of necessity: the probing hands of the local grocer which had in time become a memory; the small cash stowed away more for the joy of a secret than any solid hope it provided; the repeated queries of the crippled man on the origin of her name, the cruelty unsaid yet felt; the rain that drenched her dress and ran down between her breasts, cold as death itself.

    Death, in the end, remained unexplained—the brothers suspected that Martina had killed the crippled man&mash;because it was hardly a drama worth dwelling upon, either by them or by the world. "The woman's history was not theirs to know, even though they now were part of it themselves. Their circumstances made them that, as hers made her what she'd become." When the brothers roamed on in their journey, and the woman lived on among still lifes in the house, what was felt by the readers, and would continue being felt by them, was the weight of time.