| |
The Mark of the Angel
by Nancy Huston
- 0-375-70921-5
- $12.00
- 240 pp
"At once [a] love
story, war tale and psychological thriller. . . . An engaging, intelligent
novel."--The Plain Dealer About the Book
|
About this guide
The questions, discussion topics, author biography, and suggested reading list
that follow are intended to enhance your group's reading of Nancy Huston's The
Mark of the Angel. We hope they will add to your exploration of Huston's
beautifully rendered observations on the impact of war on individual lives and
the intricate ties that bind humankind. In 1957, a young German girl arrives
in Paris, a city still recovering from World War II and on the brink of another
period of violence and intolerance fomented by escalating tensions between France
and Algeria. Saffie, however, is indifferent to both past and present conflicts.
Seeking only to find food and shelter, she accepts a job as housekeeper for
Raphael, a privileged young man and acclaimed musician. Entranced by Saffie's
cool and distant manner, Raphael seduces her and, in heady defiance of his
mother's objections, soon makes her his wife. But neither Raphael's open
adoration nor his sexual passion breaks through Saffie's shell; even the birth of
their child leaves her unchanged. A chance encounter turns out to be the spark
that awakens Saffie from her dreamlike state. On a routine errand for Raphael,
Saffie meets Andr‡s, an instrument maker in the Marais, Paris's teeming immigrant
neighborhood. The attraction between them is as immediate as it is inexplicable,
as undeniable as it is dangerous. The winner of the Grand Prix des Lectrices
de Elle and a finalist for the Prix Goncourt in France, The Mark of the
Angel is a mesmerizing portrait of lives touched by the horrors of public
tragedy and haunted by unspeakable personal memories.
For discussion
- Why is The Mark of the Angel narrated in the present tense? What
effect does this have on the reader? In addition, the narrator often addresses
the reader directly--for example, "While we were busy drinking pastis with
Mademoiselle Blanche, the real drama was taking place" [p. 45]. She even comments
on the flow of the story itself: "Let's speed things up here a bit--it's so
exhilarating, this power" [p. 47]. What does the author accomplish by
interjecting these remarks in the flow of the narrative?
- Raphael claims
that "had it not been for his mother's explicit and unshakable opposition, he
would have joined the Resistance movement at the end of '43" [p. 9]. Has the
passage of time colored Raphael's recollections of his wartime experiences, or is
he, at age twenty-eight, simply reiterating the opinions he formed as a
fifteen-year-old boy? What does the description of the death of Raphael's father
and his mother's reaction to it [p. 8] tell you about the Lepage household even
before the war and about the man Raphael grew up to be?
- On Saffie's first
day as his maid, "Raphael sprinkles his explanations [of her duties] with little
jokes and stories to put her at ease" [p. 17]. Which character is more
uncomfortable and why? Why is the scene recounted entirely from Raphael's point
of view?
- When he and Saffie make love for the first time, does Raphael's
pleasure come from genuine feelings of love for Saffie [p. 27]? What other
emotions are at play? Is Saffie entirely untouched by the experience or does she
also find some satisfaction? What does each of them hope to achieve by getting
married? Are their motivations similar in any way? Is Raphael naïve in
thinking motherhood will change Saffie [p.44]? Does fatherhood change him?
- Memories of her own childhood surface for the first time when Saffie is alone
with Emil for a weekend. Why do they prompt her to say, "When Emil starts to
talk, he'll call her not Mutti but Maman. Mutti is over and done with and so is
Muttersprache, both are over and done with, once and for all" [p. 67]? Is she
expressing regret or hope? What did Saffie learn from her teacher's "macabre
history lesson" [p. 69]?
- Compare Saffie's initial encounter with
András to her first meeting with Raphael. How do the descriptions of
András and his workshop set the stage for Saffie's "total metamorphosis"
[p.91]? What literary devices does the author use to make this scene at once
realistic and magical?
- When Saffie is with András, "Her life in
Germany no longer exists; nor does her life on the Left Bank--she can say, do, be
anything she wants" [p. 101]. What does András offer her that she doesn't
find with Raphael? Beyond her profound connection to András himself, why
does she feel so at home with him and the stream of visitors to his shop? Does
András's angry impatience with Saffie's ignorance about the French-Algerian
war [p. 106] and about Jewish culture in the Marais help to bring the two of them
closer together or does it symbolize an unbridgeable gap between them? Why is
Saffie "overcome by a weird euphoria" when she learns András is Jewish [p.
112]?
- In contemplating what he should reveal to Saffie about his past,
András asks himself a series of questions: "Why should I tell her the true
story instead of the made-up one? How does this truth concern her? Which truths
are we required to pay attention to, and which can we ignore" [p. 116]? How do
each of the three main characters answer these questions in the course of the
novel? Which responses come closest to your own and why?
- The novel's
title comes from a love scene at the height of András and Saffie's affair
[p. 124]. How does it relate to the novel as a whole? Discuss how Saffie,
András, Raphael, and Emil each embody a different definition of "innocence."
Do András and Saffie violate Emil's innocence by making him a silent
accomplice in their affair? In your opinion, do the reasons the narrator offers
for Saffie's ease in leading a double life [p.159] absolve Saffie from guilt?
- Why is Saffie so reluctant to allow Emil to start school [p. 175]? In what
ways does Emil's presence affect the relationship between Saffie and András?
- Saffie recalls both the evils her family experienced--the death of her best
friend [p. 73], her mother's rape by Russian soldiers [p. 120], and the Allied
bombing of her village church that resulted in the deaths of dozens of children
[p.128]--and the evil her father perpetrated as a research doctor for the Nazis.
Did one of these legacies play a greater role in Saffie's withdrawal from reality
after the war?
- Why is András able to face the horrors of the past more
willingly than Saffie does? What strengths does he draw from his experiences in
Hungary during World War II and the Hungarian Revolution of 1956? What role does
his support of the Algerian underground in Paris play in healing the wounds of
the past? Is he motivated only by idealism?
- When Saffie and András have a
violent argument about András's political activities, Huston writes: "The
truth--which both of them sense though they refrain from saying it out loud--is
that they've finally touched on the essence of their love, its secret sacred
core. What they love in each other is the enemy" [p. 149]. Do you agree with this
characterization? If so, do you think it is unusual for two people to create a
relationship on this basis?
- Compare Emil's relationship with András to
the one he has with his father. If Raphael had been a more attentive father,
would the story have unfolded differently? What do you think happened to Saffie
in the years following the events recounted in The Mark of the Angel?
- Throughout the novel, Huston charts the escalating tensions between France
and its former colony, Algeria. How does this emerging war color your reactions
to András's and Saffie's stories of World War II? Why does Huston use news
bulletins about the war and other events to frame the story? How does she
illuminate the private lives of the characters and their internal reactions to
external events?
- Huston writes, "How can so many worlds exist
simultaneously on one little planet? Which of them is the most genuine, the most
precious, the most urgent for us to understand? The connections among them are
complex, yet not chaotic . . . causes sparking off effects that become causes in
turn and so on and so forth, ad infinitum" [p. 159]. Is it possible to give an
objective answer these questions? Are there events or tragedies so compelling
that everyone is forced to react to them? How do the events in The Mark of the
Angel support your position? Can history be understood through bare facts alone
or is it always informed by subjective perceptions? Are the connections Huston
writes about political and historical, or are there other ties among disparate,
often contradictory, co-existing realities?
- How does The Mark of the
Angel compare to other books you have read about the war and the postwar period?
What does a work of fiction reveal about historical events that nonfiction books
don't?
Suggestions for further reading
Marguerite Duras, The Lover, The War: A Memoir; Sebastian Faulks,
Birdsong; Anne Frank, The Diary of a Young Girl; Ursula Hegi,
Stones From the River; Nadine Gordimer, My Son's Story; Thomas
Keneally, Schindler's List; Milan Kundera, The Unbearable Lightness of
Being; Primo Levi, The Periodic Table; Michael Ondaatje, The
English Patient; Cynthia Ozick, The Shawl; Bernhard Schlink, The
Reader; Isaac B. Singer, Enemies: A Love Story; William Styron,
Sophie's Choice; D.M. Thomas, The White Hotel; Elie Wiesel, The
Forgotten.
| | |
 |