About this guide
The questions, discussion topics, and author biography that follow are intended
to enhance your reading experience of Jack Maggs by Peter Carey. Part historical
novel, part literary fantasy, this captivating story of reinvention and unveiling
is at once frightening, mysterious, and compelling.
London, 1837. Jack Maggs, a foundling trained as a thief, betrayed and deported
to a penal colony in Australia, has reversed his fortunes. Under threat of
execution he returns to London after twenty years of exile to try to fulfill his
well-concealed heart's desire. Masquerading as a footman, Maggs places himself in
the rather eccentric household of Percy Buckle, Esquire. But when the unlikely
footman comes under the scrutiny of the brilliant and unscrupulous young novelist
Tobias Oates, an enthusiastic dabbler in mesmerism, Maggs's secrets are revealed
and he is forced to take desperate, sometimes violent action. A powerful and
unusual homage to Charles Dickens's Great Expectations, Jack Maggs displays all
of Peter Carey's broad historical and artistic knowledge, his masterful command
of character, and his powerful moral vision. It is an unforgettable novel which
will continue to stir the reader's imagination and emotions long after it has
been read.
For discussion
- Maggs is a strong man with certain weaknesses. What in his background might
have caused the tendency toward romantic fantasy (about Phipps, for example)
which is so much at odds with his general clear-sightedness? What makes him
violent; what makes him kind and tender?
- Tobias Oates is possessed of an "unholy thirst for love" [p. 43]. How does
this thirst shape and rule his life? Does he turn it to a strength or a weakness?
Is it this thirst for love that inspires his equally strong thirst for power?
- Percy Buckle has many admirable characteristics: early in the novel Mercy
Larkin says that he is "the kindest, most decent man in all the world" [p. 79].
What turns him sour and fills him with hate? What weaknesses in his character
allow this hatred to take over his soul?
- There is much speculation by the characters in Jack Maggs about the "Criminal
Mind." Oates thinks that Jack Maggs is an example of the criminal mind, but as
the events unfold his ideas on the subject become less and less clear. Has Maggs
been made a criminal by his nature, or by his environment? Is Oates, in your
opinion, a criminal? What about Buckle, Phipps, Mary Britten, or Tom? Is there in
fact any such thing as a criminal mind?
- Who or what is the "Phantom" that haunts Jack Maggs's dreams? When Maggs
dreams that he kills the Phantom [p. 124], what does this fantasy signify?
- What effect has Sophina's abortion and the loss of their baby had upon Jack
throughout his life? Might this loss have inspired Jack's original love for
little Henry Phipps? Why do you think he persists in his love for Phipps at the
expense of his own children back in Australia? Maggs says that he determined to
"weave [Phipps] a nest so strong that no one would ever hurt his goodness" [p.
287]. Does Maggs's story imply that such protection is finally impossible?
- How would you describe Mary Oates: is she really merely "good" and "dull" [p.
212] as her sister sees her? Just how astute is she about her husband? From the
time of Lizzie's fatal illness, Mary begins to hate her husband, and this hatred
eventually "would penetrate the deepest reaches of her soul and make her into the
slow and famously dim-witted creature who was commonly thought not to understand
half of what her famous husband said" [p. 342]. This sentence implies that
earlier, she was neither slow nor dim-witted. What do you think?
- Maggs is never a "gentleman"; Phipps is. What does this tell us about the
class system in nineteenth-century England, and about the author's attitude
toward it? What changes were occurring in the class system at that time, and how
are these changes illustrated by the novel and its characters? Tobias and Buckle
look on Maggs as a servant, themselves as masters: how does Carey subvert this
idea? Mercy says that although he had two children of his own, Maggs "had an aim
to find a better class of son" [p. 346]. Are Maggs's motives really as simple as
this?
- Two of the themes Jack Maggs returns to again and again are those of guilt
and shame. For what crimes, real or imagined, do Oates and Maggs feel the most
guilt and shame? What betrayals has each of them committed? Is their shame
justified? Are there any characters in the novel who seem to be without guilt or
sin?
- Maggs tells Mercy that he was flogged by "a soldier of the King," to which
she replies, "Then it were the King who lashed you" [p. 346]. What does Carey
mean to imply about the social ills of England, and of the Australian penal
colonies? How do Maggs's dreams, in which his Phantom is dressed as a
soldier--and the reality in which the miniature he possesses of Phipps, the
soldier, turns out to be the portrait of the former King George IV--contribute to
the novel's political metaphor?
- "It would not have been lost on [Oates] that Mercy Larkin's wedding
finger was blown away, and that when Jack Maggs came to her side, the pair were
finally matched in deformity" [p. 355]. What would not have been lost on
Oates--what, that is, do the twin deformities symbolize?
- Oates envisions the end of Maggs's story with Maggs being burned alive in his
mansion. Which ending is more artistically appropriate: the one imagined by
Oates, or the one Carey actually gives Maggs?
- As a companion piece to Charles Dickens's Great Expectations, with Oates as
Dickens and Maggs as Dickens's convict Magwitch, Jack Maggs can be seen as a
reflection upon the creative process. Maggs sees Oates's usurpation of his life
and thoughts as theft: "You are a thief," he says; You have cheated me, Toby, as
bad as I was ever cheated" [p. 305-6]. Is Maggs justified in believing this? If
so, is such theft an inevitable part of the creative and transformative process?
- If you have read Dickens's Great Expectations, how do the characters of Maggs
and Phipps differ from those of Magwitch and Pip, and why has Carey introduced
these differences? How do the character and life of Dickens himself differ from
that of Oates? What elements of the plot of Jack Maggs could be called
"Dickensian"? What are the implications of a contemporary Australian novelist
harking back to nineteenth-century English traditions?
Suggestions for further reading
Peter Ackroyd, Dickens; Julian Barnes, Flaubert's Parrot; Anthony
Burgess, A Dead Man in Deptford, Nothing Like the Sun; A.S. Byatt,
Possession; Charles Dickens, Great Expectations, The Pickwick Papers;
E.L.Doctorow, Ragtime; Umberto Eco, The Name of the Rose; John Fowles, The French
Lieutenant's Woman; David Guterson, Snow Falling on Cedars; Robert Hughes, The
Fatal Shore; Edgar Johnson, Charles Dickens: His Tragedy and Triumph; Thomas
Keneally, The Playmaker; David Malouf, The Conversations at Curlow Creek; Alan
Moorehead, Cooper's Creek; Iris Murdoch, The Black Prince; V.S. Naipaul, A Bend
in the River; Michael Ondaatje, The English Patient; Phyllis Rose, Parallel
Lives; Salman Rushdie, Midnight's Children; Patrick White, Voss.
Also by Peter Carey, available from Vintage International:
Novels:
Short Stories:
Also by Peter Carey
Novels: Bliss (1981)
Short Stories: War Crimes (1979)
|