Random House: Bringing You the Best in Fiction, Nonfiction, and Children's Books
Newletters and Alerts

Buy now from Random House

See more online stores - This Crazy Time

Buy now from Random House

See more online stores - This Crazy Time

This Crazy Time

    Select a Format:
  • Book
  • eBook

Living Our Environmental Challenge

Written by Tzeporah BermanAuthor Alerts:  Random House will alert you to new works by Tzeporah Berman and Mark Leiren-YoungAuthor Alerts:  Random House will alert you to new works by Mark Leiren-Young


List Price: $13.99


On Sale: September 06, 2011
Pages: 304 | ISBN: 978-0-307-39980-9
Published by : Knopf Canada Knopf Canadian Publishing
This Crazy Time Cover

Share & Shelve:

  • Add This - This Crazy Time
  • Email this page - This Crazy Time
  • Print this page - This Crazy Time


Passionate, profound and funny, Berman is inspiring people from all walks of life to get off the sidelines and fight the good fight--and win. This unique book--part manifesto from a leader, part humorous activist memoir from a soccer mom--offers a wryly honest, behind-the-scenes, ultimately uplifting look at the state of the planet. For almost 20 years, Tzeporah Berman has been one of our most influential environmentalists. A founder of ForestEthics and PowerUp Canada, she was instrumental in shaping the tactics and concerns of the modern environmental movement.

In her early 20s she faced nearly one thousand criminal charges and 6 years in prison for her role organizing blockades in Canada's rainforest. She later transformed her tactics and sat down with CEOs and political leaders to reshape their policies and practices. In her new role at Greenpeace International she is fighting the problem of our time: climate change. This Crazy Time is an impassioned plea for a better world.


First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win.
—Mahatma Gandhi, paraphrasing labour organizer Nicolas Klein’s speech to garment manufacturers, 1918
“CAN YOU COME HOME SOON?” my son asks as we sit talking into our computers on different sides of the world. Then, before I can answer, he adds, “Have you saved the polar bears yet?”
Sitting at a cast-iron table at a café on the edge of an Amsterdam canal, I’m wondering about this crazy time we live in and what it’s going to take to create a world where a child doesn’t grow up worried about the fate of the polar bears, let alone his own fate.
I’ve just finished my first week of work at Greenpeace International as the co-director of the global climate and energy programme. Every day I’m inspired and humbled by the knowledge, commitment and diversity of experience crammed into the perpetually buzzing four storey building on the outskirts of Amsterdam. I’m excited by the opportunity to share an office with more than a hundred brilliant, passionate people working at all hours, in many languages, determined to overcome cultural differences, time differences and enormous odds to patch together environmental strategies with thousands of others who are working in similar offices and other organizations around the world. I am also afraid of suffocating in the red tape of an organization this big, overwhelmed by the scale of the problems we face and, after nineteen years of professional activism, I still have moments of wondering when my life will go back to normal.
But this is the new normal for many of us in the twenty-first century. I’m supposed to be en route to Bangkok to meet with Greenpeace staff from across Asia, but protests against the Thai government closed most of the city, so we moved the meeting to Hong Kong. Then the flight to Hong Kong was grounded, so now I have a stolen day to try to wrap my head around the recent changes in my life, the scale of the problems we’re facing and my new job trying to “save the polar bears.”
Thousands of miles away, on an isolated island off the west coast of Canada, Quinn waits for my response. I look at his eager face on the screen and find myself second-guessing the decision to shortly take my kids from their home that’s a few hundred yards up the hill from their six-room school on an organic farm to this crazy, vibrating city that never seems to sleep.
As I spend my days and nights at the office, I worry that I don’t have what it takes to do this new job—to help coordinate hundreds of climate and energy campaigners and organizers from dozens of countries, whose aim is nothing less than an energy revolution. Our mission isn’t “just” to stop global warming, it’s to protect what’s left of the world’s pristine places and ensure what’s known as “climate justice”: fair agreements over energy use between developed and developing countries.
The most amazing, inspiring and frustrating thing isn’t that we can’t address these issues, it’s that we can and don’t. The experts keep telling us we have a way through this, that we have the technology to change the way we deal with our energy needs. The Princeton professors Stephen Pacala and Robert Socolow wrote in Science in 2004: “Humanity already possesses the fundamental scientific, technical and industrial know-how to solve the carbon and climate problem. We are not dealing with a failure of technology, a failure of industry, a failure of human ability. We are dealing with a failure of social and political will.”
That’s why, even with this big a mission and the blizzard of e-mails and calls every day from people in India, China, Brazil, Australia, Canada and the United States, most of the time I think I’m clear on what needs to happen. We don’t need to be rocket scientists, we don’t need to build a new widget—we need to find ways to organize, to demand that our elected officials and major corporations put in place the policies and laws that will regulate pollution, reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and stimulate the use of existing clean technologies. After years of doing this work, I can usually draw on some lesson, experience or campaign and focus on making a decision, giving advice or designing a plan.
Then, out of nowhere, there are moments when I feel as if I’m twenty again and making it up as I go along, almost paralyzed by the scale of the change required and by the realization that I’m suddenly helping to direct the climate campaign of one of the largest environmental organizations in the world. My lowest points come when I think about the impact this responsibility will have on my boys, how much travelling I’ll have to do, how much time we’ll be apart.
“How many days left before you come home, Mommy?” asks Forrest, when we start our nightly talk on Skype. Forrest is twelve. Then Quinn, who is eight, takes over the computer. “Forrest cried for an hour yesterday, but he told me not to tell you.”
As I picture Forrest crying, I’m less concerned about whether I can mediate the internal dispute over Greenpeace’s position on energy from biomass, or whether we can launch a legal challenge against a new coal plant in the Czech Republic than I am that I can’t crawl under the covers and read him a bedtime story in which everyone lives happily ever after.
But this is the moment when change finally has a chance. Today, “green is the new black,” and everyone from Paris Hilton to Bill Gates wants to do what they can to fight climate change. Every business from Coca-Cola to Walmart to your corner store is trying to figure out how to capture the socially conscious market, but not necessarily how to reduce their ecological footprint. Yet we are living in a world where everybody at least claims to want to do something to help—whether by recycling more or consuming less. Individuals, corporations and governments are all more open than they’ve ever been to exploring solutions, and investment in clean technologies is at an all-time high.
In 2009 Europe developed more renewable energy than energy from coal, oil or nuclear power. After decades of receiving blank looks or shameless laughter from politicians and corporate leaders whom I have lobbied on environmental issues, I knew the message had finally sunk in when US President Barack Obama declared, “Our future on this planet depends on our willingness to address the challenge posed by carbon pollution.”  Then Jiang Bing, head of China’s National Energy Administration, announced Beijing’s plans to spend 5 trillion yuan, or about US$738 billion, over the next decade to develop cleaner sources of energy.
We’ve come a long way from the days of solar panels and windmills being the pipe dream of some West Coast hippies. Tipping points are moments when opinions and decisions shift quickly and dramatically—when new concepts, theories or ideas spread like wildfire. Tipping points create political space and opportunity for change.
The changing market for clean energy and world leaders’ recognition of the need to address environmental challenges has created a tipping point that truly gives us an opportunity to re-envision the world.
That’s why I returned to Greenpeace International, after leaving the organization a decade ago. I took this position in a city halfway around the world from our home on Cortes Island knowing it would mean less baking, less gardening, less Lego, fewer games of Go Fish and Battleship, fewer bedtime stories and more heartbreaking calls like these.
When I look at my children, I am frequently haunted by the words of experts like Dr. James Hansen, who recently stepped down as NASA’s top climate scientist, who warns that the earth’s climate is reaching a stage beyond which climate change will spiral out of control. We are already seeing a rise in violent storms, droughts in some parts of the world and floods in others leading to escalating food costs, water scarcity, ocean acidification and economic instability.
The number that should be haunting every parent and inspiring every choice we make—not just in the shopping mall, but in the voting booth—is 350. That’s the parts per million of carbon dioxide that scientists say our atmosphere can safely process. We’re currently at almost 390 parts per million. Study after terrifying study has shown that if we don’t get that level back down to 350, we will be unable to avoid apocalyptic consequences such as the floods in Sri Lanka that recently displaced a million people or the devastating fires in Russia. This is a crazy time we are living in. We simply can’t afford to keep spewing junk into our atmosphere, where it is building up and smothering the planet. Yet for decades we have been burning our way through oil and coal and treating our atmosphere like an ashtray. Now, according to the United Nations, the economic implications, including the impact on water, food and human dislocation, make climate change the greatest challenge humanity has ever faced.
Dr. Hansen wrote in 2010 (which, by the way, tied 2005 as the hottest year since humanity started keeping stats on the planet’s temperature in1880),7 “The predominant moral issue of the twenty-first century, almost surely, will be climate change, comparable to Nazism faced by Churchill in the twentieth century and slavery faced by Lincoln in the nineteenth century. Our fossil fuel addiction, if unabated, threatens our children and grandchildren, and most species on the planet.”
The situation is serious enough that in 2007 the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, the keepers of the global “Doomsday Clock,” moved the hands two minutes closer to midnight because of the dangers posed by climate change.
The US general Wesley Clark warns that “energy security is crucial to national security.” We know this from watching wars fought over oil, or from experiencing how vulnerable our society is when energy prices skyrocket and millions of people simply can’t afford to get from A to B, or the price of staples like rice and fl our rises dramatically.
And the organization Christian Aid is predicting that by 2050 more than one billion people will be forced out of their homes by climate change, creating an unprecedented number of global refugees.
If peak oil, security issues and clearly fragile economic systems that depend on finite resources aren’t enough to get your attention, we also now know that fossil fuel use has been linked to everything from mercury poisoning, to asthma, to changing patterns of infections and insect-borne diseases, and skyrocketing mortality rates due to heat waves, reduced water and threatened food security. The medical journal The Lancet’s Health Commission in 2009 warned: “Climate change is the biggest global health threat of the twenty-first century.”
Michael McGeehin, director of the Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States, agrees. “Heat waves are a public health disaster. They kill, and they kill the most vulnerable members of our society. The fact that climate change is going to increase the number and intensity of heat waves is something we need to prepare for.” Even Jeroen van der Veer, the chief executive of Royal Dutch Shell, has given speeches saying, “Regardless of which route we choose, the world’s current predicament limits our maneuvering room. We are experiencing a step-change in the growth rate of energy demand due to population growth and economic development, and Shell estimates that after 2015 supplies of easy-to-access oil and gas will no longer keep up with demand.”
Of course, the CEO of Shell is not therefore seriously advocating that we transform our energy systems to depend on renewable energy instead of fossil fuels. In fact, Shell and most of the other major oil and gas companies seem hell-bent on literally going to the ends of the earth (stripmining for oil in the Canadian tar sands or deep-water drilling in the fragile Arctic) to get at what’s left. My point is that regardless of your opinion of the solution or your impetus for change, there is a growing recognition from all corners of society that we need to change how society functions and fuels itself, and something’s gotta give.
I’m not interested in spending time convincing anyone that global warming is happening. I am invested in convincing you that we need to make major changes in our lives and the laws and policies that govern our societies in order to reduce our dependence on dirty energy and protect the earth’s living systems. Even the most devout climate change deniers know our consumerist lifestyle is unsustainable because it’s based on dirty, dangerous and finite resources, such as coal and oil, instead of on those that we know are renewable, like sun and wind.
It doesn’t take a climate scientist to realize there isn’t enough oil left for everyone in India and China to live like North Americans. Regardless of whether you accept the science behind climate change, or the clear health risks, there are other economic and national security reasons that should worry you.
The need to ensure access and equity in emerging economies should be a pretty strong motivator. The carbon footprint of the poorest one billion people is around 3 percent of the world’s total footprint, yet climate change affects these communities the most. The past one hundred years have been a frenzy of development and pollution. We’ve benefited in many ways, but now we’re starting to live the repercussions. It’s as if we’ve thrown a massive party in our parents’ house and have to clean up the mess in the living room before Mom and Dad get home—except in this case it’s our grandchildren’s house that we’ve trashed.
From a big-picture perspective, the solutions seem clear, and we are already seeing them emerge in many places around the world. We need to dramatically reduce our dependence on finite resources and dirty fossil fuels. We need to rebuild our society so we’re not dependent on food that was farmed on one continent, processed at the other end of the planet and then shipped to the consumer. We need to move to a sustainable economy driven by renewable resources, in which the value of clean air, clean water and biodiversity are taken into account when we make economic and political calculations.
And what’s the worst thing that happens if we act to change the way industrial society is fuelled and then it turns out that NASA, the CEO of Shell, a four-star general, the United Nations and pretty much every scientist and government on the planet were wrong about climate change? We end up with renewable energy systems, more local food production, cleaner air, cleaner water, more vibrant communities, fewer species going extinct, fewer people dying of cancer and respiratory diseases, millions of new clean energy jobs and increased global security.
My favourite cartoon about climate change is by Joel Pett from USA Today. It shows the audience at a symposium looking at a PowerPoint list of objectives: “energy independence, preserve rainforests, sustainability, green jobs, livable cities, renewables, clean water, air and healthy children.” Meanwhile, at the back of the room, one cranky guy asks, “What if it’s a big hoax and we create a better world for nothing?”
So this isn’t a book to convince you of the dangers of climate change. There are many excellent books out there (pretty exhaustively referenced here if you want to access them) that will do that and scare your socks off. This is a book that will, I hope, help you to get off your butt so you can kick some—starting with your nearest politician’s. So, in the following chapters I will share with you—in the belief that stories are and always have been helpful signposts and guides from which we can find direction for ourselves too—some stories of why and how I have engaged with these issues, what has worked and what hasn’t. Hopefully, in the process I will give you some ideas of how you too can engage—at whatever level you choose—in some of the defining issues of our age.

From the Hardcover edition.
Tzeporah Berman|Mark Leiren-Young|Author Q&A|Author Desktop

About Tzeporah Berman

Tzeporah Berman - This Crazy Time

TZEPORAH BERMAN is a co-founder of ForestEthics and PowerUp Canada, and the former Greenpeace International Climate and Energy Co-Director. She has been designing and managing environmental campaigns for almost twenty years. She is known for her role in coordinating the largest civil disobedience in Canada’s history, the logging blockades in the rainforests of Clayoquot Sound in 1993, during which she was arrested and charged with 857 counts of criminal aiding and abetting. She is also known for her work in creating unlikely alliances with the logging industry and major paper and wood consumers that have resulted in the permanent protection of millions of acres of old-growth forests. She was one of the experts in Leonardo DiCaprio’s documentary, The 11th Hour. The Royal BC Museum has included her in a permanent exhibition as one of the 150 people who have changed BC’s history. She has been lauded as “Canada’s Queen of Green” in a cover story in Reader’s Digest and was recognized by the Utne Reader as one of 50 Visionaries Who Are Changing Your World.

About Mark Leiren-Young

Mark Leiren-Young - This Crazy Time

Photo © Jay Dodge

MARK LEIREN-YOUNG is the author of Never Shoot a Stampede Queen, winner of the 2009 Stephen Leacock Medal for Humour, and The Green Chain—Nothing Is Ever Clear Cut. He wrote, directed and produced the award-winning feature film The Green Chain, and wrote and produced the EarthVision award–winning TV comedy special Greenpieces. His stage plays have been produced throughout Canada and the US and have also been seen in Europe and Australia. As a journalist he has written for such publications as TIME, Maclean’s and the Utne Reader. He’s half of the comedy duo Local Anxiety and has released two CDs—Greenpieces and Forgive Us We’re Canadian.

Author Q&A

20 Writerly Questions forTzeporah Berman

1. How would you summarize your book in one sentence?
In This Crazy Time I tell stories from the past 18 years of blockades, boycotts and boardrooms to inspire others to get off their butt and kick some - starting with their nearest politicians.
2. What inspired you to write this book?
I have met so many people over the years that care about environmental issues and want to make change but have trouble figuring out how to engage or they think they can’t because they are not an expert. Then a couple of years ago I met youth from across Canada at the International climate negotiations in Copenhagen. They were hungry for stories of campaigns I had worked on and tips of what works and what doesn’t.  
3. How long did it take you to write it?
2 years.
4. Where is your favourite place to write?
Sometimes it is cafes with my earphones in and some good music and a really good coffee but other times it is curled up in bed with a big cup of mint tea.
5. Did you do much research?
Well, the book is a result of 18 years of campaigns and research but during the writing of it we had to research up to date facts and figures all the time.
6. If there was one book you wish you had written what would it be?
The Geography of Hope
by Chris Turner.
7. What’s the best piece of writing advice you have ever received? 
I think it was advice from Louise Dennys at Random House in our second meeting. I was struggling with how to make sense out of all these disparate experiences and stories and how to tie it all together into a book. She told me to, “Think of the book as a campaign and plan it out then just tell one story at a time and weave them together.”
8. If you could talk to any writer living or dead who would it be, and what would you ask? 
Barbara Kingsolver - I would just tell her that sometimes she explains what I am thinking so clearly it is a relief, and she does it with such grace and humour it makes my heart sing.
9. Do you listen to music while you write? If so, what kind?
Yes almost always. Right now my favourites are Jack Johnson and John Mayer.
10. Who is the first person to read your manuscript?
My husband Chris.
11. Do you have a guilty pleasure read? 
My twelve year old son’s fiction. When he is sleeping I sneak in and borrow whatever he is reading! It started with Harry Potter and then moved to Rick Riordan's Percy Jackson and recently Suzanne Collin's The Hunger Games...
12. What are you reading right now?
I just finished Ian McEwan’s new book Solar.
13. What was your favourite childhood book?
Harold and the Purple Crayon
or maybe Where the Wild Things Are. When I got older I was deeply affected by The Diary of Anne Frank.
14. Were you always interested in writing?
Yes when I was younger but this is really the first time I have written anything longer than a press release or report in almost twenty years.
15. What do you drink or eat while you write?
Really good coffee or lattes or herbal tea. I never eat when I write.
16. Typewriter, laptop, or pen & paper?
17. What did you do immediately after hearing that you were being published for the very first time?
Poured a glass of wine, went out onto my deck on Cortes Island to look out over the lake and called my husband. 
18. What was the most surprising fact you uncovered while writing your book?
The tarsands operations in Albert result in 1.8 Billion Litres of toxic water being spewed into open pit unlined mines EVERYDAY. On the flip side we also uncovered that last year for the first time in humand history, the combined new investment of renewable energy (solar, wind etc ) was greater than the investment in new oil, coal and nuclear.
19. If readers learn one thing from your book, what do you wish it to be?
We are living a tremendous tipping point moment in which we all have an opportunity to affect whether we have clean air to breathe and water to drink, whether we protect the last of the wild and choose clean, safe renewable energy over dirty, limited and dangerous fossil fuels. In this moment decisions are being made over whether the poor will have access to energy and whether new emerging economies leap the fossil fuel era and learn from the mistakes that we have made in industrialized countries. We don’t need to be rocket scientists, we don’t need to build a new widget––we need to find ways to organize, to engage each other and hold our elected officials and major corporations accountable. You don't have to be an expert, we all have a role to play. Actually engaging in the debate and organizing is way more fun and satisfying than just taking out the recycling or writing a guilt cheque for carbon offsets. Start small. Write a letter to your MP. Have a dinner specifically to discuss an issue you care about and invite someone from one of the groups working on that topic. Go to a rally or protest. It can snowball from there!
20. What is the best gift someone could give a writer?
Space. A great dinner. Review time and serious, thoughful feedback.

Author Q&A

It was the oddest thing to watch as one after another, the scientists and UN officials and all my environmental colleagues from around the world made statements condemning Canada.
After hearing that, every morning I’d get up at five and go to the main coordinating office to check the agenda, which was larger than an encyclopedia. I’d flip through it, underlining and highlighting sessions I thought I should attend. I went from international panel to international panel and learned more than I ever wanted to know about the coming impacts of climate change. What blew me away most was not just the statistics but that so many scientists were unable to stop themselves from crying.
The second day in Bali, Canada had the dubious honour of receiving the Fossil Award of the Day for a leaked memo that showed Canadian delegates had been instructed to agree to nothing short of binding targets for all countries. The memo went on to propose that Canada push for a “special circumstances” addendum. The positions were designed to derail the negotiations in Bali. The Harper government knew full well that China would never agree to be treated the same as the “developed countries” that had created the mess to begin with, let alone agree to special circumstances for Canada and other oil-producing nations. The result was that Canada could hide behind China, and the Harper government was left with a very convenient excuse to do nothing.
I delivered my speech, and it was a tough one to make because I’d never felt less proud of being Canadian. So that’s what I talked about. “Today I stand here as a Canadian, ashamed. Ashamed that while the international community struggles to fight global warming, Canada is developing the largest fossil fuel project in the world, the Alberta tar sands. Ashamed that my government has reneged on our Kyoto commitments and is refusing to commit to strong absolute emissions reduction targets and, more than that, holding up important international agreements that would chart a path forward.”
Then I laid out for them just how much climate change had already changed Canadian forests. Ten million hectares (25 million acres) of forest are completely dead due to pine beetle infestations. The pine beetle is an innocuous little bug that used to die every winter when the temperature dropped below minus forty degrees. The problem is that the beetles don’t die seasonally anymore because it doesn’t get cold enough. The result is that pine beetles are eating their way through British Columbia’s old-growth forest.
There were over a thousand environmentalists in Bali for the climate talks. At the end of every day hundreds would meet and vote on which countries did the most to hurt the potential for progress in fighting climate change. Canada won first, second and third place. On the third day, Canada’s minister of environment, John Baird, finally arrived, just in time to win all three days’ Fossil Awards.

From the Hardcover edition.



"Tzeporah Berman has risked life and liberty in what is ultimately the greatest cause: the future of this planet.... This Crazy Time takes us inside the war against those who are so recklessly and ruthlessly destroying the earth while most of us sleep."
—Ronald Wright, author of A Short History of Progress

"Tzeporah Berman is a modern environmental hero, and this fascinating book shares her exciting history, and the even more exciting thinking that it's given rise to. If we get out of our ecological woes, she'll be a big reason."
—Bill McKibben, author of Eaarth and founder of 350.org

"If you've ever uttered the word 'can't,' you need to pick up This Crazy Time.... You'll walk away with an honorary MBA in changing the world."
—Adria Vasil, author of the Ecoholic series

Your E-Mail Address
send me a copy

Recipient's E-Mail Address
(multiple addresses may be separated by commas)

A personal message: