Random House: Bringing You the Best in Fiction, Nonfiction, and Children's Books
Authors
Books
Features
Newletters and Alerts

Buy now from Random House

  • Borderlands
  • Written by Derek Lundy
  • Format: Trade Paperback | ISBN: 9780307398635
  • Our Price: $17.95
  • Quantity:
See more online stores - Borderlands

Borderlands

Riding the Edge of America

Written by Derek LundyAuthor Alerts:  Random House will alert you to new works by Derek Lundy

Borderlands Cover

Bookmark,
Share & Shelve:

  • Add This - Borderlands
  • Email this page - Borderlands
  • Print this page - Borderlands
ABOUT THE BOOK ABOUT THE BOOK
ABOUT THE AUTHOR ABOUT THE AUTHOR
PRAISE PRAISE
Synopsis|Excerpt|Table of Contents

Synopsis

"The periphery of a place can tell us a great deal about its heartland. along the edge of a nation's territory, its real prejudices, fears and obsessions - but also its virtues - irrepressibly bubble up as its people confront the 'other' whom they admire, or fear, or hold in contempt, and know little about. September 11, 2001, changed the United States utterly and nothing more so than the physical reality, the perception - and the meaning - of its borders."
-from Borderlands

Derek Lundy turns sixty at the end of a year in which three good friends have died. He feels the need to do something radical, and sets out on his motorcycle - a Kawasaki KLR 650 cc single-cylinder "thumper," which he describes as "unpretentious" and also "butt-ugly." Fascinated by the United States' post-9/11 passion for security, particularly on its two international borders, he chooses to investigate.

He takes a firsthand look at both borders. The U.S.-Mexican borderlands, often disorderly and violent, operate according to their own ad hoc system of rules and conventions, and are distinct in many ways from the two countries the border divides. When security trumps trade, the economic well-being of both countries is threatened, and the upside is difficult to determine. American policy makers think the issues of drugs and illegals are ample reason to keep building fences to keep Mexicans out, even with no evidence that fences work or are anything but cruel. Mexicans' cheap labour keeps the wheels turning in the U.S. economy yet they are resented for trying to get into the country illegally (or legally). More people have died trying to cross this border than in the 9/11 attacks.

At almost 9,000 kilometres, the U.S. border with Canada is the longest in the world. The northern border divides the planet's two biggest trading partners, and that relationship demands the fast, easy flow of goods and services in both directions. Since the events of 9/11, however, the United States has slowly and steadily choked the flux of trade: "just-in-time" parts shipments are in jeopardy; trucks must wait for inspection and clearance; people must be questioned. The border is "thickening."

In prose that is compelling, impressive and at times frightening, Derek Lundy's incredible journey is illuminating enough to change minds, as great writing can sometimes do.


From the Hardcover edition.

Excerpt

CHAPTER 1
A HOLY ALTAR
 
THIS LAND IS YOUR LAND, THIS LAND IS MY LAND . . .
THIS LAND WAS MADE FOR YOU AND ME.
—WOODY GUTHRIE
 
Remember the Alamo? Part of America was forged there. Almost all the elements of America’s story of itself were present during the thirteen-day-long battle in 1836 at a small, remote, old Spanish mission deep in the heart of Texas. I intend to ride the border from east to west, but the Alamo, in the centre of San Antonio, is a necessary place to start. It is about three hundred miles north of Brownsville at the present border’s eastern end, but it’s as much a part of the history of the borderlands as if it was right on the Rio Grande—the River—or in some nearby dusty border town.
 
Americans remember the story of the Alamo because it seems to represent everything they hold dear in the United States: courage and sacrifice in the name of freedom; like-minded citizens coming together under arms to resist tyranny; a laconic and offhand heroism; an absorption with democracy and the rights of man; a demonstration of America’s destiny to grow west and south, and maybe north, too (perhaps only the ocean could limit this God-sanctioned expansion and dominion). And military prowess: like the soldiers of the War of Independence, the few men at the Alamo fought for a long time against a superior enemy.
 
The battle at the Alamo was a siege, and it is the sieges of history that catch the imagination: Masada, Constantinople, Londonderry, Leningrad, the Battle of Britain. The besieged almost always have the choice of surrender, a way out of their fear and suffering. They must keep their guts and hearts strong to resist the threat and press of the encircling enemy over a stretch of time. This is far more than the momentary heroism of battle, which rides on a surge of fear and adrenaline, and is over and done with quickly. At four in the morning, in the dark, with time to think about death, how easy and appealing it must seem to get things over with, to give up.
 
That’s what another group of Americans did a few weeks after the Alamo fell. Between 400 and 450 men under Colonel James Walker Fannin surrendered to the Mexican army under General Antonio López de Santa Anna after the Battle of Coleto Creek, near Goliad, about a hundred miles south of San Antonio. The Americans had been assured of good treatment and they were briefly held prisoner. But on March 27, 1836—Palm Sunday—their guards, under Santa Anna’s orders, and over the objections of less bloody-minded officers, divided them into three groups, marched them off in different directions and massacred them. Three hundred and forty-one men were killed, in an atrocity that mobilized support for the Texan cause across the territory, and within the United States, as well.
 
Coleto Creek made it clear that this was to be a war to the finish, but somehow it did not trigger a popular emotional response, as did the Alamo. Far more men were killed at Goliad, but unlike the massacre there, the Alamo was a fair fight in the sense that the defenders chose to keep resisting. Killing them was not, therefore, a crime, but merely cruel war.
 
The account of the Alamo in U.S. mythology is dramatic and colourful. Two hundred men fought to the death against an army of five thousand. It was to be a victory for Protestants over Catholics and for free white men over degenerate mestizos. The American commander, Colonel William B. Travis, traced a line in the sand and said: “Those of you who are willing to stay with me and die with me, cross this line.” All but one man did so. The defenders knew from the beginning that their position was hopeless, but they fought on. Their battle cry was “Victory or Death!” They died to a man on the mission walls and in the shadowy niches of its stone buildings. Davy Crockett was one of them, and his blood, wrote one historian, was shed upon “a holy altar.”
 
The story has become a part of the mythology of the United States: how it was founded; how it grew and prospered; how it was a beacon for the world it eventually came to dominate. Every nation tells a story of itself to explain and justify how it arrived at where it is now, and to provide guidance and comfort to its people in the present. The myth is the version of itself the nation would like, and in fact needs, to be true.
 
Historians and other academics revise or debunk myths. They question the story of the Alamo. How can we know what really happened, they churlishly ask, if every man there died? And the fight for Texan independence from Mexico (in 1836, Texas was part of the Mexican state of Coahuila y Tejas) was hardly a battle of cultures. When the Texas Declaration of Independence was signed, David G. Burnet was the president of the new republic, but its vice-president was Lorenzo de Zavala. In those days, a “Texian” was as likely to mean a Spanish-speaking, brown-skinned Catholic whose family had lived in Texas for a hundred years or more, as a white, Protestant Anglo whose parents had recently come from England, Ireland or Germany. But none of these historical nuances or cautions means much to a nation and the story it tells about itself. Historians may quibble, but the people keep the faith.
 
The chain of events from the Alamo to the border is straightforward. The fight to the death there, and the massacre at Goliad, drew volunteers and aid from the United States. Texas (or the eastern third of the present state north of the Nueces River) won its independence from Mexico with a decisive victory at San Jacinto, later in 1836. Whereas a Texas that was part of a Mexican state could become part of the United States only through invasion and war, an independent Texian republic could join the United States voluntarily. After several unsuccessful attempts (because of disagreements in Congress), the United States annexed a willing Texas in 1845, ignoring Mexico’s loud objections.
 
For all these reasons of history, I must look at the Alamo if I want to understand the border. I’ll ride to Goliad, too, to find there the antithesis of remembered glory.
 
 
Here’s how my motorcycle ride along the two thousand–mile-long U.S.-Mexico border begins: I almost kill myself three, maybe four, times in the first sixty seconds.
 
In retrospect, this shouldn’t really surprise me. I bought this bike new a few months ago, and I’ve ridden it for about nine hundred miles, none of those in the last six weeks. Before that, I have to go back exactly twenty-five years to the last time I sat on a motorcycle. Now, I’m carrying about ninety pounds of gear on a Kawasaki KLR 650 cc, single-cylinder “thumper,” and it’s the first time I’ve ridden with a heavy load of any sort. I’m wearing my brand new armoured riding jacket, pants and boots—the first time I’ve worn them all together—and their padded bulk distracts me. Protecting my precious skull is a new helmet, different in design from the one I’m somewhat used to. It’s a “full coverage” helmet with a chin guard as well as a plastic visor, and it feels claustrophobic.
 
I have to pull out of a motel parking lot onto the service road of Interstate 10 on the fringe of San Antonio, Texas; the traffic, even on this road, is moving at forty or fifty miles an hour. I must turn into the fast-moving stream, accelerate hard, crunch my way through the gears, and, as I’m doing that, merge left across three lanes to get onto the highway itself. If I wanted to attempt suicide on a motorcycle, this would be a pretty good way to do it.
 
I wait for a hole in the rush of heavy metal, turn out of the driveway, and twist the throttle. Right away, it’s time to change into second. I have to slide my left foot under the shift lever, but I can’t do it. The armoured pads in my pants make it difficult to bend my knee, which also butts up against the pannier bag hanging down over the gas tank in front of me. I can’t manoeuvre my leg to get my foot into position. It just never occurred to me to check beforehand that I could do this. Cars scream and screech around me, braking hard, swerving; I’m going way too slowly. In my rear-view mirror, I see a jagged wall of vehicles bearing down on me; they look like squadrons of tanks. In a few seconds, I pass from worry to fear to sweaty terror. I’ve already begun to change lanes; now I reef the bike back to the right, trying to avoid getting sucked onto the highway at twenty miles an hour. The bike’s engine is screaming in first gear; if I were in fifth, I’d be hammering along at fifty miles an hour. Then . . . there . . . did it—into second gear. I twist the throttle. I throttle it. I signal left again, but then, the same problem: I can’t get into third. I slide back to the right again.
 
In all these changes of direction, I’m aware of large metal masses flashing by me on both sides, very close. Horns honk in a weird doppler rise and fall—a reflection of how fast the other vehicles are, how slow I am. Someone shouts at me: “Asshole!” He’s right. I feel what I’m sure is the slight “thlip” of a car’s outside mirror flicking the arm of my jacket as it zips by—another two inches and it could have ripped off my goddamn arm. Holy fucking shit! Dear God, nearer to thee: I renounce atheism. This is madness; I’m going to die. I feel the deep sorrow the prematurely dying feel for the people they’re about to leave behind; for my wife, and for my daughter and her teenage orphanhood.
 
But then a side road appears on the right. I slam the bike into it too fast, and the rear wheel slides; I wobble, unused to the feel of the luggage-loaded machine. Just managing to stay upright, I pull over to the road’s quiet edge. I put my boots down, and sit in the saddle. I shake, I almost puke, in the aftershock of my barely avoided death.
 
Thoughts pass at random through my alleged mind: I’m so stupid . . . no, I’m a colossal idiot; I’m too old for this; I’ll never make it to the goddamn border, never mind ride its long length, on bad roads, with bad guys all around; what in the name of sweet Jesus do I think I’m doing? Why the hell didn’t I check that I could actually ride this bike with a big load and my unfamiliar riding gear, before inserting myself into heavy traffic? I damn near joined you then, boys, I say to Will, Chris and Mike.
 
I prop the bike on its side stand and dismount. My legs feel fragile, not quite attached to my torso. I wonder vaguely what my blood pressure was a few minutes ago out there on the road. High, very high. It won’t be the last time it red-lines on this trip, I’m sure of that. I’m old enough that this is something I think about.
 
I reposition the tank panniers so that I have more knee room, but it’s not a perfect adjustment for my long legs and feet. Sitting in the saddle again, I can get my toe under the shift lever only if I bend my leg out from the bike at an odd angle. I ride up and down the quiet, dead-end side road trying out my technique. It works most of the time, although I often miss the gear, and sometimes I have to look down to make sure my foot is in the right position before I flip up the lever. Taking your eyes off the road’s variegated surface, and away from the close surround of traffic is not at all a safe practice on a two-wheeler. But my adaptation will have to do, and I hope I’ll get used to it.
 
The second beginning of my border ride works well enough. I reach the highway in jerky, knees-akimbo manoeuvres. I’m glad there are no veteran bikers around judging my greenhorn style as I jam the lever into top gear and reach a cruising speed of sixty or sixty-five miles an hour—without risking my life more than is usual for a ride in foreign, city-expressway traffic. At least I planned ahead enough to avoid rush hour; it’s around eleven o’clock and there’s a medium amount of traffic about. I must have made an even distribution of my load because, once I settle down in my lane, in the flow of vehicles, the bike feels balanced and, even with the added weight, there’s no lessening of power I’m aware of.
 
In spite of my very bad start, my discomfort is displaced right away by a surge of pure motorcycle happiness. It’s an emotional summary of all the constituents of riding fast: in the open, in the rush of wind, under the wide sky, with the road sweeping by below, everything around brought into insistent and immediate focus. It’s the happiness of adrenaline and the abandonment of constraints—with an edge of danger. When you’re sitting around and talking about riding, it’s easy to acknowledge the possibilities of disaster, but once on the bike, on the road, all those intimations of mortality are swept full away by joy.
 
 
I begin my first day by riding away from the Alamo, north and east towards Austin to meet a friend. Jane was a business associate, ex-campaign manager and old friend of Ann Richards, the Democratic governor of Texas whom George W. Bush defeated in his stroll to the presidency. By some unlikely coincidence, Jane lives part of the year on Salt Spring Island, my own small, remote home off the coast of British Columbia.
 
I head north out of San Antonio, away from the traffic and congestion, and into the low hills, sandy plains and trees—cottonwood, willow and acacia—of this eastern edge of the Texas Hill Country. On this less-travelled road, there are few small towns—Twin Sisters, Blanco, Dripping Springs—and, therefore, only a few gear changes. This is nice, but I’m not getting much practice. As I ride, the weather grows cooler and cloudier. It looks like rain, which is just what I don’t need on my first traumatic day, but it holds off. The wind is a problem, though. It blows across my path or dead against me, depending on the road’s curves. It’s confirmation that this bike doesn’t do well in a crosswind; even a gust at twenty miles an hour blows me around my lane. I’m beginning my battle with the wind, which will continue, most days, for the next four weeks. Twice, it will come close to killing me.
 
I sit on the curb outside a gas-station store eating a ready-made ham and cheese sandwich on white and a Snickers bar, drinking a coffee. While I eat, I admire my motorcycle. Or rather, I try, once again, to justify—and to appreciate—its ungainliness. The KLR 650’s tall, somewhat broken-backed profile, high fenders and hand guards make the bike look like a large, steroid-pumped dirt bike. It is to other motorcycles as the head-hunched stork is to birds, the humpback to whales, the hyena to land mammals. With the stock nubby tires (I’ve changed to more street-kindly rubber for this trip), it can go off-road under a skilled rider, but it’s too heavy a machine to do much of that.
 
The KLR’s real appeal is not that it’s born to do one thing well, but that it can do several disparate things reasonably well. For example, a sleek, chromed Harley-Davidson can hum along a good road, at speed, in comfort, but it gets into trouble when the road surface turns bad. The KLR can bash over ugly, rocky gravel and dirt roads, and, if necessary, go where there isn’t a road; pound along the freeway all day at seventy or seventy-five miles an hour—not in real comfort, but it can do it; carry more fuel than most other motorcycles—a little over five gallons (veteran riders call it the “tanker”); pack a heavy load; and keep going forever. It’s a supremely utilitarian machine with a twenty-year record of getting riders across countries, and around the world, too.
 
It began as a Kawasaki military design for the United States Marine Corps—a bike that could endure rough conditions and offhand treatment. From the beginning, it was clear that the KLR was one of those machines with a soul; that is to say, that for whatever reasons of luck or human ingenuity, all of its intricate constituent parts worked, and held together, with persistent efficiency. It did what it was supposed to do, and it did so for a long time. The company brought out a civilian version in 1987, and didn’t make a substantial change to the KLR until the 2008 model. Why tinker with the success of such a subtle and rare amalgam as a superb machine? In fact, it’s become something of an icon, and its riders are cultish and devoted. A lot has changed in motorcycle engineering in the last twenty years, but the KLR remains determinedly old-fashioned. You can buy a part now that will fit any year’s model back into the 1980s. That’s the reason I can climb aboard one now, and have everything about the bike look and feel just the same as the last time I rode bikes, back in 1980.
 
However, the one thing the Kawasaki designers and engineers didn’t spend much time on was looks. Part of the problem is the KLR’s dirt-bike heritage, and its original purpose of lugging Marines from the halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli. The best you can say about the KLR is that it has a kind of robust handsomeness. If you can’t bear to go that far, perhaps you can admit that it evinces the modest, functional aspect of an unpretentious, purposeful machine. Mostly though, you have to admit it’s just butt-ugly.
 
 
In Austin, Jane rifles through files, Rolodexes and memories to get me some contacts. She even makes phone calls on the spot to let people know who I am, and that I’ll be calling. I leave with a long list.
 
Before I have a chance to ride southwest, back towards San Antonio and the Alamo, I get a call from Linda, one of the contacts on Jane’s list. Linda and her husband, Bob, invite me to join them for lunch. We meet at a Mexican restaurant where they eat so often that one of the house salsas has been named after Bob. The recipe is his: cheese, meat, hot sauce and spices. Bob is in his seventies, friendly, folksy, retired. He was in politics for a while, and acted as Bill Clinton’s deputy secretary of the interior. He was the main proponent of converting a huge ranch in the Big Bend country of West Texas into Big Bend Ranch State Park—I’ll ride through it in a few weeks. Bob knows British Columbia; he and a partner, together with Linda and their then-young son, once panned for gold in the province’s northern interior. The government shut them down, Bob says, to make a park. He sued and won $3.5 million, but the amount was knocked down to $70,000 on appeal, he doesn’t know why. He’s not fond of Canadian so-called damn justice. I want to know more, but Linda takes over.
 
She used to be an attorney, and ran the government’s antitrust office in Washington. She’s energetic, firm and precise, holds definite opinions and does most of the talking. I get the impression she keeps amiable Bob sorted out and organized. We talk about immigration.
 
The United States, says Linda forcefully, is the only country in the world where, when immigrants arrive, they’re immediately considered Americans. Well, I say, Canada does that, too. She looks blank, doesn’t respond. There’s a silence. Canada doesn’t seem to enter into any equation she’s aware of; perhaps nothing outside the United States does, even for this educated, intelligent American. And Australia, I say. I think it takes that attitude too. No, she says. There’s prejudice there; they hate immigrants. A friend was just there, and she told her that.
 
Bob and Linda don’t like the idea of my border ride. They insist I should call the people on Jane’s list along the way and let them know when I plan to arrive. If something happens to me and I don’t check in with them, they can call the police. Linda is especially concerned. Many parts of the border on the U.S. side are poor and isolated, she says. A lot of the people there have nothing. I have a big bike with lots of new, shiny things on it. Maybe some guys will decide they’d like to have it; perhaps I’ll stumble into a drug deal, or some plain bad or crazy guy. I should just ride through the border counties like Starr, Zapata and Webb as fast as possible. McAllen and Rio Grande City are drug-importing centres; they’re very dangerous places.
 
I tell them I intend to cross into Mexico at Laredo and ride on the other side of the river for a couple of hundred miles—in Mexico, the road follows the river, while on the U.S. side there’s a long dogleg inland. Bob and Linda look at me in incredulous silence. Bob shakes his head. No, Linda says. Don’t do that. Nuevo Laredo is far too dangerous. Drug wars are being fought out there. And the border road is suicide. But I’ll ride through Nuevo Laredo by day, in the morning, I say—drug guys don’t get up early. And I’ll make a fast nonstop trip. Maybe I’ll cross back into the U.S. sooner, at Piedras Negras, instead of riding all the way to Ciudad Acuña. No, no, no, they say. If I were travelling with someone, maybe; but, alone? No, no, no. Don’t do it!
 
I tell them I’ll reconsider my plan. I say to myself: Bob and Linda are getting on in years (although they’re not that much older than me), and older people always exaggerate the dangers of crime and violence. I’ve printed out Internet maps of a route through Nuevo Laredo and along Mexico’s Highway 2. My intent has always been to stay on the American side—that’s the border perspective I want—and to cross into Mexico only when the route is shorter there. I assumed I’d be safe in Mexico if I rode by day and was careful. But maybe I’m wrong.
 
 
Riding slowly to get out of Austin, I broil and sweat in the muggy heat, maybe thirty-five degrees. In my riding jacket, gloves and helmet (just jeans on my legs), I can bear the temperature at highway speeds. At stoplights, I feel as if my head and upper body are in a furnace. On Interstate 35, the traffic is very heavy; a Harley-Davidson passes me, gets slowed down, and then I pass him. We alternate for a while. Its rider is fat, and wearing a sleeveless vest and jeans. His arms are tattooed, and on his head is a soft hat—no helmet (if you’re over twenty-one in Texas, you don’t have to wear one)—whose brim stands up in the wind like a cavalryman’s. This rider is certainly more comfortable than me, and he can feel the hot wind on his bare skin, but I shudder when I think of what would happen if he went down. He’d probably die; if he survived, he’d lose a good amount of his body’s largest organ, his skin. When denim or other fabric gets embedded in skin after a long slide on tarmac, nurses or doctors must scrub with a stiff brush to get the cloth fibres out. Even morphine won’t take care of the pain. Of course, that possibility is part of the motorcycle’s traditional mystique: if you ride, you take your chances. Getting togged up in pads and armour like mine defeats the whole idea of a bike. To the fat rider with the hat and tattoos, I’m beneath contempt.
 
That’s also the reason he doesn’t wave at me, or nod. It’s motorcycle etiquette to do so, thus acknowledging the brotherhood of the road and its shared danger, the making of a mutual promise that the riders will look out for each other in the constant battle to stay upright and alive. The wave or the nod is the non-verbal equivalent of “Be safe,” or “Be careful out there.” But the practice has exceptions; the apparent democracy of the motorcycle has its hierarchy. Outlaw bikers or Easy Rider wannabes don’t wave to civilians like me, not even to civilians on Harleys. Harley riders will sometimes wave to non-Harley riders, but often they don’t. I’ll discover that they hardly ever acknowledge the existence of someone on a jumped-up dirt bike. I give this guy on the I-35 a wave, but he shows no sign that I exist.
 
A short way out of Austin, the traffic slows to stop-and-go. I’m dutifully shuffling along in my lane, changing gear awkwardly, sweating again, when another rider zooms by me between lanes. A little way ahead, he swerves over to the shoulder and rides nimbly along it. I remember that lane splitting is legal in some states, and tolerated in many. Texas must be one of them. I’ve never done this before, and I feel a Canadian hesitation about breaking the rules. But I’m hot and the jam stretches ahead as far as I can see. I swing over to the shoulder and accelerate until I’m bowling along, passing the shuffling cars at twenty-five miles an hour. When the shoulder surface gets narrow and bad, I swing right and bump across hard-packed grass, through a dry, shallow ditch, and up onto the service road, on which the traffic is moving well. The KLR can do this cross-country shift so easily, and I’m happy with its versatility and my own ability to ride over the rough ground. After a while, I see the overturned tractor-trailer that’s causing the jam. I swing back, triumphantly, onto the highway again.
 
 
After all my trepidation, getting to the Alamo next morning isn’t bad at all: a few wrong turns, a little heavy traffic, and some missed gear changes. Many of the Texans I’ve spoken to have told me to be very careful on my bike in Texas because the driving is fast and aggressive. But, so far, the drivers have been courteous, almost solicitous. They give me space, and they don’t tailgate—although I’m riding in the most cautious and defensive manner possible.
 
Soon I’m in downtown San Antonio following the signs to the mission. I give a parking lot attendant a $5 tip above the $10 fee, to look after my bike and gear. He’s happy to do it, carefully stowing my helmet and hanging up my jacket inside his shack. Then he comprehensively parses a four-letter word: “I’ll look after your bike,” he says, “but not that one—Fuck it!” He jerks his thumb at a big, tricked-out Harley parked nearby. “That fucker wouldn’t give me no fuckin’ tip, man.”
 
The pleasant, grassy, tree-shaded compound of the Alamo is just across the road. It faces the Guinness World Records Museum and Davy Crockett’s Tall Tales Ride.
 
The Alamo is a shrine—its main extant building is the old mission church—and also a place of secular veneration and devotion. Its care and maintenance were assigned by legislation in 1905 to the Daughters of the Republic of Texas. They must preserve it, says the law, “as a sacred memorial to the heroes who immolated themselves upon that hallowed ground.”
 
The Daughters have produced brochures about the history of the place that are surprisingly well balanced; they recount the Alamo’s exciting legend, while also gently mentioning that that might not have been exactly the way things happened. They implicitly acknowledge that myth and history are seldom the same thing. I’m impressed by this sophistication. Nevertheless, the Daughters make themselves very clear: the fight in 1836 was a desperate and heroic struggle against overwhelming odds by men who were willing to make “the ultimate sacrifice for freedom.” The Alamo is the “Shrine of Texas Liberty.”
 
It’s cool in the shade of the old trees, but I stroll about the grounds in a welter of tourists. It’s still the March school break, and this is obviously one of the places families go for entertainment, and for patriotic edification. Two and a half million visitors a year make the pilgrimage to the Alamo—almost seven thousand every day. There’s a small museum, a theatre, a library (which is closed) and the usual gift shop.
 
I must line up for an hour to enter the shrine itself. The people wait in the hot sun and humidity with quiet patience. There are as many Hispanics as Anglos; as much Spanish is spoken around me as English. I wonder if the Hispanics have mixed feelings about this place. How, exactly, do they remember the Alamo?
 
Just outside the door is a sign that says: “Quiet, No Smoking, Gentlemen Remove Hats, No Photos.” An attendant reinforces these messages as we shuffle forward: “This is the shrine. Treat it as one, please. Keep your voices down. Please respect the memory of these brave Texans.”
 
Inside, I see many flags: the ubiquitous Revolutionary War’s Gadsden flag with a rattlesnake on it and the slogan “Don’t Tread on Me”; a Texas banner with the words “Come and Take It.” A line of flags represent where the defenders came from: almost all the states within the then-United States, as well as other nations—mostly England, Scotland and Ireland, but there is one each of Wales, Germany and Denmark. There are statues of St. Anthony, and a mission bell. Davy Crockett’s rifle and vest hang in the sacristy, like the relics of a saint. In display cases lie books about Crockett, a pocket watch belonging to the last courier who left the Alamo to plead for help, a silver spoon with the name “Bowie” engraved on it, a document written by Crockett to resolve a lawsuit between two litigants.
 
At the back of the shrine is the altar. Here, during the siege, were constructed earthworks upon which the defenders set up several cannons. On the sacred and consecrated ground, the Texans loaded and fired, loaded and fired. In the end, either Mexican soldiers overran their position and killed them all, or the Texans surrendered and were executed.
 
Near the shrine is the “Wall of History,” a line of panels that tell the legendary story of the battle with gusto, and without the Daughters’ qualifications. In front of the wall, a guide shouts out a lurid, blow-by-blow account of the fighting. Although he must have given his spiel many times, he appears, at crucial moments, to be overcome by his own emotion. When all but one man steps across Travis’s line in the sand, and when Davy Crockett goes down in a hand-to-hand melee, the guide must pause to stop his tears and steady his voice. The crowd catches the mood; they listen with care, in silence. I see a few nearby women, and a man, wipe their eyes. I feel the emotion myself. This story of men giving up their lives for an idea has a power that rivets us all. We’re in the brief, intense, universal thrall of martyrdom.


From the Hardcover edition.

Table of Contents

AUTHOR’S NOTE
PROLOGUE
 
PART I
SOUTH
1 A Holy Altar
2 A Larger Empire
3 The Third Country
4 God’s Right to Come
5 History Is What Hurts
6 Line in the Sand
7 Riding the Dirt
8 A Well Regulated Militia . . .
9 The Third Nation
10 Riding to the Sea
 
PART II
NORTH
11 A Portal for Terror
12 Quoddy Head
13 Borderlands Nation
14 The Paranoid Style
15 Riding to Niagara
16 Riding the 49th
17 A Strange Land
 
EPILOGUE
 
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
PERMISSIONS


From the Hardcover edition.
Derek Lundy|Author Desktop

About Derek Lundy

Derek Lundy - Borderlands

Photo © Christine Mauro

Derek Lundy is the bestselling author of Godforsaken Sea: Racing The World's Most Dangerous Waters, The Way of a Ship: A Square-Rigger Voyage in the Last Days of Sail, and The Bloody Red Hand: A Journey Through Truth, Myth and Terror in Northern Ireland. He lives and rides on Salt Spring Island, B.C.

Author Q&A

On April 1, 2008, the Department of Homeland Security announced that any environmental law or regulation that would prevent, or slow down, the construction of the new fence along the entire southern border would be waived. “Criminal activity at the border does not stop for endless debate or protracted litigation,” said then-Homeland Security head, Michael Chertoff. The department had used its waiver powers (given to it under the Real ID Act of 2005) three times before to allow new fencing near San Diego, and in two other border areas of Arizona. But the April 1st waiver was massive; it applied to thirty-six federal laws.

The Homeland Security secretary has powers that not even the president can exercise, even during a national or military crisis. And the department’s power affects everyone who lives in the third country of the borderlands. In that zone of conflict and confusion, all constitutional and legal bets are off.

It’s not surprising that the most concerted objections to the new fence come from the “Valley,” as the northern bank of the River from the Gulf to Rio Grande City 150 miles upstream is called. Some ranches and farms straddle the Rio Grande, and tens of thousands of people cross back and forth every day to work, to go to school and to shop. For Homeland Security, anything is fair game in achieving its goal, from waiving laws and regulations to expropriating private land. For the people of the Valley, the fence is a Berlin Wall that will divide a unique Tex-Mex society that exists on both sides of a narrow river.

In a March 2008 editorial, the New York Times paraphrased Winston Churchill, who once upon a time warned about another barrier on another continent: “From San Diego on the Pacific to Brownsville on the Rio Grande, a steel curtain is descending across the continent.”


From the Hardcover edition.

Praise

Praise

"Get on the bike, we're gonna have us a ride. Derek Lundy's border meditation takes us deep inside the American obsession with security. His clear Canadian eye and clean prose makes me realize that my country shouts about safety but is frightened by life itself."
-Charles Bowden, author of Down by the River: Drugs, Money, Murder, and Family

"Intrepid adventure traveller, daring investigative reporter and rigorous historian, Derek Lundy rode his motorcycle on "the edge" in more than one way - the borders of the United States with Mexico and Canada, yes, but he also often rode the edge of survival, against wind, rain, heat, cold, gravel, mud and homicidal logging trucks. Equally, he faced the extremes of the American frontier myth in the twenty-first century, as I have also experienced them, as represented by the Border Patrol, the Department of Homeland Security, and vigilante groups like the Minutemen. His polished prose is searingly honest about himself and what he experiences, and his story goes well beyond the conventions of "where I went and what I saw." He takes the reader into the deeper complexity of "what it all means." Borderlands is entertaining, enlightening and important. I hope it will be widely read, and in particular by Americans - to witness what is being done in their names at the ragged edges of their great country."
-Neil Peart, author of Ghost Rider and Roadshow

"The two wheels of Lundy's bike trace an illuminating path through space and time. A great ride and a great read, Borderlands is a profound exploration of the rough ground where rival histories, ethnicities, and mythologies jostle for their place in the sun."
-Ronald Wright, author of A Short History of Progress and What Is America?

“[A] complex and absorbing portrait of the anxious, post-9/11 U.S.A. . . .  supremely enjoyable — an artful story, a provocative rumination . . . Lundy [is] erudite, reasonable and amusingly self-deprecating [and] provides succinct historical overviews throughout, reminding us of what the here-and-now is founded on.”
-Vancouver Sun
 
 “The book is part travelogue and part lesson on the continent’s history. But mostly, it’s a fascinating look at U.S. national security post–9/11 and the human consequences. . . . Besides covering the political, the book gets personal, detailing Lundy’s struggles with his motorbike, painful injuries, and reflections on his own mortality. The joy of the ride runs through it all.”
-The Georgia Straight
 
“Superbly rendered story. . . . Lundy’s analysis, and meditation on, what it’s like for Canada and Mexico to share a border with the world’s superpower in a post-9/11 world is both convincing and alarming. . . . Borderlands is tough to pigeonhole. It’s part travelogue, part history, part analysis of U.S.-Canada relations and part reflection on the joys and pains of biking. Regardless, it’s all good.”
-Winnipeg Free Press
 
“With interesting historical facts that everyone can probably stand to brush up on and keen insight into the contemporary political climate, Borderlands is a valuable contribution to North American studies. But above all it is a good read, peppered with Lundy’s personal travails as the motorcycle ride progresses and he meets the borders’ quirky inhabitants.”
-Gulf Islands Driftwood

Open and honest about his failings as a rider, Lundy employs a wry sense of humour that keeps the pages turning as the miles fly by. . . . Borderlands is well-balanced, both in terms of interview subjects and the exposure given to the northern and southern U.S. borders. . . . While the book is primarily a travelogue commenting on America’s growing security obsession, in the borderlands between politics and memoir a fine history lesson exists, and Lundy is an excellent teacher.”
-Quill & Quire (starred review)


From the Hardcover edition.

Your E-Mail Address
send me a copy

Recipient's E-Mail Address
(multiple addresses may be separated by commas)

A personal message: